Factory Health Score™
OEE Factory
Production Attainment
Throughput
Capacity Utilization
Revenue at Risk™
OEE Intelligence Center
Factory → Line → Machine drill-down · Real-time
OEE Trend — Factory Level
Availability & OEE over time vs 85% target
Factory OEE Breakdown
OEE Gap Analysis
11.5pp below target — Availability is the primary drag. MC-07 breakdown accounts for 4.2pp of availability loss.
Line OEE Overview — Click to drill down
Avail.
92.4%
Perf.
93.1%
Qual.
98.5%
Avail.
88.2%
Perf.
90.8%
Qual.
98.1%
Avail.
84.1%
Perf.
87.4%
Qual.
98.4%
Avail.
69.2%
Perf.
85.8%
Qual.
98.3%
Avail.
83.6%
Perf.
87.9%
Qual.
97.8%
Avail.
84.2%
Perf.
89.3%
Qual.
98.2%
Efficiency Intelligence
Machine-level OEE ranking · Drill-down enabled
Machine | Line | Status | OEE % | Avail % | Perf % | Qual % | Output | Attain % | Cycle (s) | NG % | Action |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC-05 Fanuc Roboshot | Line 3 | Running | 91.2% | 96.4% | 96.1% | 98.4% | 12,400 | 95% | 8.2s | 1.6% | |
| MC-01 Arburg 370S | Line 1 | Running | 87.4% | 93.2% | 95.1% | 98.5% | 2,840 | 95% | 28.4s | 1.5% | |
| MC-10 Netstal Elion | Line 5 | Running | 84.7% | 92.8% | 92.4% | 98.9% | 3,680 | 92% | 22.1s | 1.1% | |
| MC-02 Engel 500T | Line 1 | Running | 82.1% | 91.4% | 91.2% | 98.7% | 1,240 | 89% | 45.2s | 1.3% | |
| MC-03 Haitian MA900 | Line 2 | Running | 79.3% | 88.7% | 91.5% | 97.8% | 5,620 | 91% | 18.7s | 2.2% | |
| MC-06 Sumitomo 180T | Line 3 | Running | 76.8% | 85.3% | 91.8% | 98.0% | 8,100 | 88% | 12.4s | 2.0% | |
| MC-11 Battenfeld 400 | Line 6 | Running | 73.9% | 84.2% | 89.3% | 98.2% | 4,100 | 79% | 16.8s | 1.8% | |
| MC-08 Milacron T225 | Line 4 | Running | 71.4% | 82.1% | 88.4% | 98.4% | 960 | 80% | 34.8s | 1.6% | |
| MC-09 Toyo Ti-150 | Line 5 | Running | 68.2% | 79.4% | 87.6% | 98.0% | 7,200 | 80% | 14.1s | 2.0% | |
| MC-04 KraussMaffei 200 | Line 2 | Setup | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| MC-07 Husky H300 | Line 4 | Breakdown | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | |
| MC-12 Demag 350T | Line 6 | PM | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Production Achievement
Hourly plan vs actual output
Daily Plan
65,200
Actual
46,530
Variance
-18,670
Hourly Rate
5,820
pcs/hr
Daily Output
46,530
pcs
Attainment
71.4%
Shift Gap
-18,670
pcs
Production Loss Tree
Interactive capacity waterfall — click each node for root cause
Total production loss today: 28.6% of capacity — equivalent to Rp 64.3M revenue at risk
Material Efficiency Intelligence
BOM standard vs actual consumption · Factory level
Material Yield
94.2%
Target: 97.0%
Usage Efficiency
91.8%
Target: 96.0%
Consumption Ratio
1.089
Target: 1.040
Material Variance
+8.9%
Target: <4.0%
Material Consumption vs BOM Standard
Top 6 materials by variance · Today Shift 1
| Material Code | Description | BOM Std (kg) | Actual (kg) | Variance | Variance % |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PP-HM-007 | PP Homopolymer Grade 7 | 1240.0 | 1463.2 | +223.2 | +18.0% |
| ABS-G-022 | ABS General Purpose | 840.0 | 924.6 | +84.6 | +10.1% |
| EPDM-R-04 | EPDM Rubber Compound | 620.0 | 658.4 | +38.4 | +6.2% |
| PA66-GF30 | Nylon 66 GF 30% | 380.0 | 399.8 | +19.8 | +5.2% |
| PC-HI-011 | Polycarbonate HI Grade | 290.0 | 301.8 | +11.8 | +4.1% |
| TPE-S-008 | TPE Styrenic Block | 180.0 | 183.6 | +3.6 | +2.0% |
Injection & Rubber Manufacturing Intelligence
Cycle time, mold health, shot count analytics
Cycle Time: Actual vs Ideal (seconds)
Mold Health & Shot Count
SMED & Line Balancing Intelligence
Changeover performance and bottleneck analysis
Changeover Time by Line (minutes)
| = 30 min target · SMED lines avg 42m vs 81m non-SMED
Line Balancing Score
Line 1
88
Line 2
74
Line 3
61
Line 4
42
Line 5
71
Line 6
79
AI Production Copilot
Powered by real-time factory data — ask anything about today's production